Comments for New Hampshire DWI Injury Attorneys - Ryan Russman

Comment on How Do the Good Samaritan Laws Affect You? by John

John — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:29:58 +0000

Valuable thoughts and advices. I read your topic with great interest.

Comment on Blood Alcohol Content and iPhone by Jennifer R.

Jennifer R. — Tue, 19 May 2009 12:44:06 +0000

As a Newbie, I am always searching online for articles that can help me. Thank you

Comment on Pulled over for a DWI in New Hampshire (part one) by Ryan Russman

Ryan Russman — Mon, 11 May 2009 19:35:52 +0000

It would not be any benefit to wait until Monday. The delay in response will make the Monday result less relevant because the BrAC levels will have all but disappeared. You want to have a second test as soon as possible to challenge the validity of the first test.

Comment on Pulled over for a DWI in New Hampshire (part one) by Pulled over for a DWI in New Hampshire (part two) | nh-dwi-attorney.com

Pulled over for a DWI in New Hampshire (part two) | nh-dwi-attorney.com — Mon, 11 May 2009 14:04:12 +0000

[...] Pulled over for a DWI in New Hampshire (part one) [...]

Comment on Pulled over for a DWI in New Hampshire (part one) by Christine R. Cover

Christine R. Cover — Sun, 10 May 2009 17:50:54 +0000

Attorney Russman,

This is a very informative article, though I am a bit confused. What if you were stopped Saturday night and requested that Occupational Health at Exeter Hospital, which is Federally Certified, (as am I), to administer the Breath Alcohol Test, but they aren”t open again until Monday; Will the officers let you wait until then?

Christine R. Cover, TPA

Comment on Defining DWI : First Offense Class B Misdemeanor DWI by Brian E. Simoneau

Brian E. Simoneau — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:13:31 +0000

Users of Ignition Interlock Devices should be aware that alcohol readings are not always caused by alcohol in the user''''s bloodstream, this is only one of three possible causes. Alcohol readings can also be caused by a malfunction of the interlock device or the device mistaking another substance for ethyl alcohol in the user''''s bloodstream. In my practice as a Massachusetts Interlock Device Defense Lawyer, I have personally seen common products such as hand sanitizer, power bars, chewing gum, windshield washer fluid, anti-freeze, baked goods, and flavored coffee all be mistaken by interlock devices as alcohol. Interlock users should be aware of the possibility of contamination by these and other sources. All interlock users should take steps to protect themselves from false positive interlock readings. These steps include documenting any unusual occurrences with the IID, immediately reporting false interlock device readings, and not ingesting anything except water before or during interlock usage. One of the best things you can do when you get a false positive reading is to immediately go to a police station or hospital to get a comparison blood alcohol test. Ignition Interlock Devices should not be mistaken for the more reliable breathalyzer. Interlock devices, which use non-ethyl alcohol specific fuel cell technology, are not as reliable as evidentiary breathalyzers, which use infra-red technology to determine blood alcohol content. IIDs are not breathalyzers, but inexpensive lockout devices. Their primary purpose is not to collect scientific evidence.

Comment on Defining DWI : First Offense Class B Misdemeanor DWI by Cheap Print Ads

Cheap Print Ads — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:08:33 +0000

I REALLY liked your post and blog! It took me a little bit to find your site…but I book marked it. Would you mind if I but a link back to my site?

Comment on Unsigned form sufficient to establish jurisdiction by Tom Alciere

Tom Alciere — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 00:21:57 +0000

They need to change the laws so this wouldn''''t count as a DWI: You get an ignition interlock, modified so the car can still start but it can''''t go anywhere. Kinda like when you start your car with a remote starter. If this is legal for a drunk to do, then drunks will stumble out of bars and into their nice, warm cars and they don''''t need to drive anywhere. After three hours, they wake up and think they''''re okay to drive, but the interlock says otherwise, which is no less innocent than using a speedometer to make sure you don''''t do too fast.

Comment on Defining DWI : First Offense Class B Misdemeanor DWI by Ryan Russman

Ryan Russman — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:09:01 +0000

As you know not all the information that you find on the internet is
correct. Unfortunately, DWI first offense, not aggravated, is a class B
misdemeanor. After one year from the date of sentencing you can
petition the court to have the criminal offense reduced to a violation.
However, the DWI remains on your DMV record for ten years.

Comment on Defining DWI : First Offense Class B Misdemeanor DWI by Gerald Townsend

Gerald Townsend — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:42:09 +0000

I have been reading on the internet that a first time, non-aggravated DUI is classified as a violation in NH, not a misdemeanor. It says a second offense is a misdemeanor. Has the law changed recently for a first time DUI?