Unsigned form sufficient to establish jurisdiction
A new court decision with regard to DWI in the state of New Hampshire was published earlier this month. In James Kerouac v. New Hampshire Division of Motor Vehicles, the Supreme Court upheld the lower court’’s decision to suspend the driver’’s license of the plaintiff, Kerouac.
According to the plaintiff, during the DWI arrest:
[Chief Campbell] checked a box that indicated that the plaintiff had failed to submit to testing. In section V of the form, titled “Officer’s Report,” Chief Campbell listed his name as the officer who swore that he requested the plaintiff to submit to testing and checked the box indicating that the plaintiff had refused testing. Chief Campbell neglected, however, to sign this part of the form, although there was a place for his signature.
The plaintiff’s license was suspended because he was deemed to have refused testing. He requested an administrative hearing to challenge this, asserting that the New Hampshire Department of Safety (department) lacked jurisdiction over the matter because Chief Campbell had failed to sign section V of the form.
The Court upheld the juridiction of the Department of Safety, indicating that an unsigned form is sufficient to warrant jurisdiction in suspension of a license during a DWI arrest.
Tags: DUI news, nh court decisions, nh dwi news
They need to change the laws so this wouldn””t count as a DWI: You get an ignition interlock, modified so the car can still start but it can””t go anywhere. Kinda like when you start your car with a remote starter. If this is legal for a drunk to do, then drunks will stumble out of bars and into their nice, warm cars and they don””t need to drive anywhere. After three hours, they wake up and think they””re okay to drive, but the interlock says otherwise, which is no less innocent than using a speedometer to make sure you don””t do too fast.